REGENERATION AND
ENVIRONMENT/
SCHOOLS,
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY PANEL
CAREERS ADVICE
AND GUIDANCE REVIEW
FEBRUARY 2013
Foreword by the Chairs of
the Regeneration and Environment and Schools, Children and Young People’s Overview
and Scrutiny Panel
At a meeting of the
Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel in September 2012, the
Panel was provided with a report updating Councillors on the work of the Private Sector-led Work and Skills
Partnership Board.
The report presented provided a full assessment of Doncaster’s present
position, work completed by the Board in recent months and an outline of what
is planned in the remainder of 2012/13 municipal year. It was explained that in order to address
challenges faced within the Borough, the focus of the partnership
is aimed to reduce unemployment and the number of NEETS across the borough.
Councillors from both the Regeneration and Environment and Schools and
Children and Young People therefore joined forces and decided to focus on a
review addressing and understanding ‘Careers Advice and Guidance’ to children
and young people within Doncaster pre and post 16.
We are therefore delighted to present the findings of this recent scrutiny review which includes recommendations made by the working group in response to some key questions raised by Members.
We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the review including Councillors, Local Authority officers, partners, stakeholders and particularly the young people from the Doncaster Youth Council who gave up their time to support the work of this group and who are much appreciated.
We look forward to receiving the response to our findings and recommendations made.
Councillor Tony
Revill |
Councillor Hilary
McNamee |
|
|
Chair of the
Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel |
Chair of Schools,
Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Panel |
Contents
Item Page
Number
Executive Summary 4
Focus of the Review 5
Method of Investigation 5
Timescale 5
Membership of the Joint Working Group 5 - 6
Contributors 6 - 7
Background 7 - 10
Evidence Gathered – What Members Learnt 10 - 17
Conclusions and Recommendations 18 - 20
Acknowledgements 21
Executive Summary
The following recommendations were made by the Regeneration and Environment/Schools Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny joint working group as its final meeting on the 11th February 2013. The reasons for the recommendations are detailed later in the report.
The group therefore recommended that: -
1. A report is presented to the Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel in autumn 2013 detailing progress with apprenticeship programmes and progress of the Work and Skills Board, following consideration of the proposed Cabinet decision entitled Investing in Apprenticeships, Skills and Jobs.
2. The action proposed for Careers Advice and Guidance School Governor Champions be supported and propose that co-ordinated support package/guidelines be developed to assist all appointed Governors, including local authority Councillors in their role.
3. The programme, actions and priorities of the Work and Skills Board, be supported.
4. The proposed Cabinet decision; Investing in Apprenticeships, Skills and Jobs, be supported.
5. Further investigation is carried out into how the parental role can be further utilised and access can be increased to career advice and information through the Work and Skills Board programme and actions.
6. The work of the Children and Young People’s Management Team in holding the remaining Local Education Authority (LEA) and Academy schools to account with regard to the quality of careers advice and guidance being provided, be supported.
7. The development of a Doncaster Council quality mark to be awarded to trainers/employers, be considered.
8. Consideration is given to what could be applied from the Barnsley IAG network to support Doncaster’s programme, bearing in mind the differing landscapes.
FOCUS OF THE REVIEW
1. To Understand and Address Careers Advice and Guidance to Children And Young People Within Doncaster Pre And Post 16.
METHOD OF INVESTIGATION
2.
At its meeting on the 3rd September
2012, the Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel considered a
report updating them on the work of the Work and Skills Partnership Board. As part of the recommendations, the Panel
agreed that a joint working
group should be formed with members from the Schools, Children and Young People
Overview and Scrutiny Panel.
3. The Regeneration and Environment and Schools Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Panel separately agreed the membership of the review group at meetings that took place on the 3rd and 11th September 2012 respectively.
Scoping Meeting
4. There was a meeting of the Regeneration and Environment and Schools, Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Panel Chairs and Vice Chair and key officers on 17 October, 2012 to discuss the scope of the review.
5. The Regeneration and Environment and Schools, Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Panel met on the 19th November, 2012 and 26th November, 2012 to respectively note the scope of the review.
TIMESCALE
6. It was initially agreed that the review would be undertaken during December 2012. This was later changed as the group requested further information to be considered and it was therefore agreed that a later meeting would be held in February 2013, with final recommendations taken to the Panel’s formal meeting on 18th March, 2013.
MEMBERSHIP OF THE
JOINT WORKING GROUP
Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny
Panel
Councillor Richard Cooper-Holmes (Chair)
Councillor Nuala Fennelly
Councillor Yvonne Woodcock
Councillor Monty Cuthbert
Schools,
Children and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Panel
Councillor Rachel Hodson (Vice Chair)
Councillor Andrew Bosmans
Councillor Tracey Leyland-Jepson
Councillor Alan Jones
Councillor Doreen Woodhouse
Full Membership of the Regeneration and Environment Overview and
Scrutiny panel
·
Chair
- Councillor Tony Revill |
·
Councillors
Deborah Hutchinson |
·
Vice-Chair
- Councillor Richard Cooper-Holmes |
·
Councillors
Ken Keegan |
· Councillors Nuala Fennelly |
·
Councillors
Ted Kitchen |
·
Councillors
Bob Ford |
·
Councillors
David Nevett |
·
Councillors
Stuart Hardy |
·
Councillors
John Sheppard |
·
Councillors
Yvonne Woodcock |
·
Councillors
Paul Wray. |
·
Councillor Richard A Jones |
·
|
Invitee:
Paul Smillie (Unite)
Paul O'Brien (GMB)
Full Membership of the Schools, Children And
Young People Scrutiny Panel
· Councillor Hilary McNamee |
· Councillor Richard A Jones |
· Councillor Rachel Hodson |
· Councillor Jane Kidd |
· Councillor Joe Blackham |
· Councillor Sue McGuinness |
· Councillor Andrew Bosmans |
· Councillor Sue Wilkinson |
· Councillor Monty Cuthbert |
· Councillor Doreen Woodhouse |
· Councillor Sandra Holland |
·
Councillor Alan Jones |
·
Councillor Tracey Leyland-Jepson |
Co-opted Members:
· Mr J Parkes – Parent Governor Primary Sector
· Mr J Hoare – Diocese of Sheffield Church of England
Invitees:
· Mr J Board – UNISON
· Mr B Parkinson - JPOC
CONTRIBUTORS
· Philip Harris – Chief Executive, Doncaster Chamber |
· Dan Fell – Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Doncaster Chamber |
· Andrew Best – Partner, HSR Law |
· Ian Hanks – External Strategic Partnership Manager for Job Centre Plus |
· George Trow – Principal of Doncaster College |
· Pam Bolderson - Head of Connexions/IAG Lead |
· Jane Vose - Head of Service for Learner Engagement |
· Lee Tillman - Head of Strategy and Programmes |
Meetings
The following meetings took place as part of the review: -
·
6th
December 2012 – Youth Council Meeting
Information gathering session attended by 17 Youth Councillors who provided responses to a series of questions posed by Members in relation to their views around careers and guidance.
·
11th
December 2012 – Careers & Guidance Review Meeting
Meeting took place to receive and discuss a range of information and views from key partners and stakeholders.
·
11th
February 2012 – Careers & Guidance Review Meeting
Meeting took place to receive further information on the work being undertaken in the school and progress of the work and skills partnership board.
BACKGROUND
Doncaster’s Current Economic Position in Relation to Work and Skills
7.
In
order to ensure the Borough’s economic growth, there is a need to:
·
Understand
what skills our businesses need to grow
and to match this demand; and
·
Ensure
that the Borough’s Young people
leave statutory education equipped with
the basic skills and knowledge (Maths, English and Employability skills) to
enable a positive transition into work and prevent them becoming not in employment,
education or training (NEET).
8.
It is
recognised that skilled, well-trained staff are more efficient, motivated and
productive, leading to more competitive businesses. Conversely, those areas with the highest
percentage of people with no/low skills are most vulnerable to either economic
downturn or recession.
9.
In the
context of increasing unemployment in the Borough, including 15% of our 18-24
year olds being out of work, it is acknowledged that the need for us to meet
this skills challenge is critical.
Within this, there is also a need to raise aspirations and engagement of
young people and their families and to offer real alternatives to a meaningful
career away from higher education routes and for them to contribute to wider
society.
Skills: The Current position
10.
According to the latest Labour Market statistics
published by the Office for National Statistics, the skills of our people still
lag behind those in other areas. It was
noted that:
·
Only 1 in 5 of Doncaster’s residents have a
qualification at Level 4 or above which is significantly below both the
national average and the regional average;
·
The percentage of people with qualifications at
Levels 2 or 3 and above has increased however, with the gap to the regional and
national average narrowing as a result.
Nearly 43% of our residents have a Level 3 qualification or above (up
from 41% in 2010), whilst 64% of residents have a Level 2 qualification or
above (up from 61% in 2010);
·
Fewer people now have ‘no qualifications’, although
at 15.2% there remains a significant gap to the regional and national average.
11.
Improving
skills, linked to the demands of our businesses, is therefore of critical
importance to the wider economy:
·
Those
areas with the highest percentage of the population with low educational
outcomes and skills are most vulnerable to recession/downturn;
·
Lagging
areas (like Doncaster) need to focus on getting the basics right (Maths,
English, basic employability skills) so individuals can achieve a positive transition post statutory
education, change careers, be more resilient in time of economic downturn and
business can be confident that employees have the necessary skills;
·
It is
likely that more jobs in the future will require higher skills (Level 3) and
there will be fewer jobs at Level 2 and below – so getting the right education
and skills platform is crucial in making a positive transition to post
statutory education and employment.
The Role of the Work and
Skills Board
12. In March 2012, a Private Sector-led Work and Skills Partnership was set up in direct response to the challenge outlined above. Chaired by Nigel Brewster (Managing Director, Brewster McBride and Skills chair for the Sheffield City Region Local Enterprise Partnership), it has representation from a range of local businesses, Doncaster College, Doncaster Chamber of Commerce, Job Centre Plus, Primary School and Secondary School Headteachers and the Council to deliver the skills in the borough that our businesses need to grow and ensure our residents get in work and stay in work. The partnership is about bringing together a greater understanding of the current issues and work towards breaking down barriers. Part of work has involved talking and working with employers and stakeholders to identify what their needs are in the current economy in terms of skills and employment.
The Board’s
aims are as outlined as follows:
·
Doncaster
taking control of its own destiny
making the most of current national
opportunities/funding;
·
Taking
action now to respond to large increases
in youth unemployment;
·
Co-ordinated action, improved
leadership and accountability through this partnership;
·
Delivery
of a single set of actions with the Borough’s resources aligned behind them to get the messages to
business/individuals;
·
Ensuring
some simple key messages are
communicated;
·
Work with the education and training sector (primary, secondary, special
and Pupil referral units) to ensure
young people leave school equipped with the skills employers desire (Maths,
English and basic employability skills); and
·
Be open
to positive challenge,
and scrutiny from business, public and private sector partners.
Partnership Work Undertaken To
Date
13. Partnership efforts so far have focused on
laying the foundations for effectively improving skills and job prospects for
the future.
·
Work has
nearly been completed on establishing the level and quality of Information,
Advice and Guidance (IAG) given to Children and Young People and Adults across
the Borough. It is viewed that good
quality careers advice, linked to the needs and wants of existing businesses,
is absolutely crucial in allowing people to make informed decisions about what
qualifications they want to undertake.
This work is informing the procurement of a ‘portal’ for pupils,
teachers, and people looking for apprenticeships or employment opportunities to
access in the future to guide their future intentions.
· A
comprehensive ‘Labour Market Information’ survey has been undertaken with 1,000
local businesses to effectively establish the state of the local economy and to
establish what support businesses need in order to grow. Questions related to:
o
Changes
to the workforce over the previous 12 months to gain an idea of business
demand;
o
The
skills of the current workforce; and
o
Future
plans for recruitment.
It is the intention that the results of the
survey will guide the development of the ‘portal’ as described above, any
changes to ‘Business Support’ offered by Partner organisations that are
required and to identify whether any training provision by our providers is
either missing or lacking the quality required by our businesses. The outcomes of these results are included in
Paragraph 19 and Appendix 1.
·
Finally,
a large amount of discussion with Private Sector firms has taken place to
promote local job opportunities, including the creation of
graduate/apprenticeship programmes and to support future major programmes such
as the Inland Port.
EVIDENCE GATHERED – What
Members Learnt
Provision Mapping
Information (16-19 Provision and 19-24 Apprenticeship data)
14. Doncaster has a very different learning landscape compared to its South Yorkshire neighbours and many other parts of the country.
15. Doncaster
has a large number of school sixth forms. Many of which are small in size. In Doncaster, there
are approximately 62% who are in the sixth form, which is almost double of
those not in the sixth form post 16 due to the high number of sixth forms in
place. It was commented that there needs
to be a valid alternative for those young people for whom the sixth form is not
a valid option. It was later commented
that some young people are making the right choices after 16 but that there are
others who are not and have to go back and begin again after 17. Concern was raised about the Governments
plans to increase the participation age to which all young people in England
must continue in education or training (requiring them to continue until the
end of the academic year in which they turn 17 from 2013 and until their 18th
birthday from 2015).
16. That young people are travelling outside of the
Borough, although it was acknowledged that individuals will naturally go to the
closest location to where they live such as which college they choose to go to.
For example, Don Valley is approximately one mile outside of a DN postcode and
therefore shows Doncaster residents going outside of the Borough to continue
their education although it is likely because it is the nearest.
17.
The data below represents the number of learning
aims on which learners are engaged, learning aims as recorded here are not all
of the same length or “volume of learning”, for example many of the Preparation
for Life and Work qualifications have a very low number of learning hours.
Therefore simply counting learning aims is not a true comparison of the volume
of learning undertaken. It was commented by one Member that the figures may
be indicative of how much effort schools are preparing young people in the
pre-16 age groups.
Further Education Provision Mix
Enrolments |
2011/12 |
2011/12
Total |
|||||
SSA Tier 1 |
Entry Level |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Other Level |
Entitlement |
|
Agriculture, Horticulture
and Animal Care |
5 |
69 |
70 |
45 |
|
|
189 |
Arts, Media and Publishing |
|
63 |
93 |
489 |
645 |
||
Business, Administration and
Law |
4 |
77 |
92 |
155 |
328 |
||
Construction, Planning and
the Built Environment |
23 |
214 |
95 |
35 |
367 |
||
Engineering and
Manufacturing Technologies |
16 |
227 |
291 |
113 |
647 |
||
Health, Public Services and
Care |
209 |
606 |
540 |
361 |
1,716 |
||
Information and
Communication Technology |
11 |
37 |
63 |
118 |
229 |
||
Languages, Literature and
Culture |
|
1 |
23 |
131 |
155 |
||
Leisure, Travel and Tourism |
8 |
341 |
118 |
156 |
623 |
||
Preparation for Life and
Work |
3,010 |
2,946 |
876 |
397 |
82 |
7,311 |
|
Retail and Commercial
Enterprise |
45 |
184 |
362 |
102 |
693 |
||
Science and Mathematics |
|
1 |
64 |
330 |
395 |
||
Not Applicable |
|
805 |
805 |
||||
Social Sciences |
|
124 |
124 |
||||
History, Philosophy and
Theology |
|
104 |
104 |
||||
Entitlement |
|
2,896 |
2,896 |
||||
Grand Total |
3,331 |
4,766 |
2,687 |
2,660 |
887 |
2,896 |
17,227 |
18. In reference to post 16 regarding the number of young people classed as NEETS (Not in Education Employment or Training) the percentage was 6% for post 16 and 2.8% not known.
Labour Market Information (LMI) Survey
19. A comprehensive ‘Labour Market Information’ survey was carried out and the results were presented to the group. Members were informed that out of 6,000 businesses contacted 613 (13%) completed the survey. The information presented to the group showed which areas/subjects the local economy are looking for from potential candidates.
The following observations and comments included: -
a. In terms of high end skills, the numbers of individuals in Doncaster who have an engineering background were questioned as some Members felt that the skills levels for this sector were still available.
b. That Doncaster only has a low number of its own graduates and many leave Doncaster to train and look for employment outside of the Borough. It was acknowledged that local opportunities for graduates are low.
c. It was also noted that many graduates who move away from Doncaster do not stay or return as they do not find Doncaster an attractive place to live.
d. It was recognised that it is very difficult in current climate to find work and that it was a very competitive and set against the backdrop of benefit changes.
e. There was a brief discussion on apprenticeships and a number of views expressed. Observations were raised on whether the issue of apprenticeships was merely the current ‘vogue’. From a private sector led point of view, it was noted that for a business, an apprentice will not ‘hit the ground running’ and it was commented that a business may benefit more from a higher level skilled graduate who will also gain more work experience. It was also noted that apprenticeships generally engage more with younger people and offer a financial incentive.
f. It was noted that more thought needs to be given regarding what Doncaster economy looks like and what this means.
g. Regarding the labour market, the group was informed that although there is the perception that there are no jobs, this is not necessarily the case. In terms of the Doncaster labour market, it was outlined that it is heavily influenced by many agency jobs but that those jobs although temporary could lead to permanent employment and enable individuals to gain more work experience and therefore be more marketable.
Feedback from Youth Council Meeting – 6th December 2012
20. From the meeting held on the 6th December 2012 with members of the Doncaster Youth Council, feedback was provided in relation to a series of questions. The following key points from the information provided at meeting included: -
· Advised where to go to through school;
· All young people know to approach Connexions for careers advice and guidance – on numerous levels e.g. Groups, individual and class based;
· Social media is an excellent source of information but young people need the drive to use this mechanism;
· Wish to see more information offered at schools and libraries;
· Would like more one to one discussions;
· Too much general information, needs something more personalised;
· Not enough support when go to college;
· Generally young people did not feel prepared for work and wished for more work experience, but in the current climate this was difficult, even voluntary work;
· Felt biggest gap was that students did not know what they wanted to do when they left school, so were unable to prepare themselves;
· Instilled that they must achieve good English and Maths GCSE grades. School pressure to achieve good grades but do not look at practical life working skills;
· Lack of understanding what the labour market needs but it was essential to be hard working, motivated and have experience;
· No sufficient knowledge and were not aware of national skill requirements – information is sought by own research;
· University is pushed to everyone with not enough vocational/apprenticeship opportunities;
· Lot of emphasis on vulnerable students;
21. In response to the feedback, it was agreed that the views of the Youth Council mirrored those of the business community and that it was the section in the middle that caused a problem. It was noted that post 16, young people know where they are going but when it is post 19 that they found it difficult to decide what happens next and only appeared to know about the Job Centre Plus at this point. Regarding apprenticeships, it was commented that these did not necessarily lead to jobs. It was also commented that sometimes the brightest children were those that received the least help.
22. It was noted during the meeting that it was not always about the young person’s own decision and that on occasion they are influenced by another person such as a family member or teacher etc. It was commented that those young people who are not academic do not necessarily know what they want, how to get there and also feel that there is nothing out there for them. It was also felt that young people are not quite as realistic as they should be about the opportunities out there.
Not in
Education or Employment and Training (NEETS)
23. It was acknowledged that in respect of NEETS (Not in Education or Employment) significant steps had been undertaken. In respect of the age group 19-24 year olds who are classified as NEETS it was recognised that there are a number of these who have Level 3 Education and waiting for employment.
Schools
24. It was commented that it is important to get the messages into schools at a very early stage. Concern was expressed that there are disaffected children who are never going to achieve GCSEs and also those that will go from school to ‘A ‘Levels and then to University but have no idea about what to do or what is needed. Concern was also expressed about those responsible for providing the necessary guidance and advice to young people in schools and felt that teachers were in need of more life experience in order to carry out this role, it was also questioned whether Teachers should be undertaking that role.
25. It was observed that young people are not aware of whom the major businesses are in Doncaster and what they have to offer and some Members felt that businesses needed to start going into schools. A Member expressed concern that as a local authority it was unable to provide the link with schools and employers. It was noted that schools were being more reactive and also don’t have the resources in place. The potential role of parents was referred to and it was commented that they were an untapped resource that would be of no cost. It was commented that in respect of what schools are providing heads are placing a cost on what they can provide. It was suggested that perhaps Governors should be questioned whether this is sufficient for young people.
Children’s University
26. There was a conversation about Children’s University and an explanation was provided to Members about what they are and what they entailed. It was outlined that it had been running for 6 years although more had accessed it in the last few years, that of 500 primary schools, 13 engage with the scheme and that although secondary schools are invited to participate, none have chosen to so. Members of the working group commented that they had not been made aware of this provision, asked why Councillors aren’t involved and asked for further information to be circulated. It was explained that it had been reported in the press and that Officers and some Members had been involved or made aware. It was suggested that it could go through the Governors Support function and get it into the leadership newsletter.
Post
17
27. It was suggested that perhaps more thought should be given to the changes that occur educationally Post 17 for those who have made decisions made at 16 plus which not worked out. Reference was again made to the concerns about raising the participation age.
Pilot
Scheme – Placements
28. The group was informed about an exercise that had taken place where 60 students had gone through a reality based selection process which had resulted in 3 ‘mini internships’ where all had resulted in positive feedback and 1 had a potential job. Concern was raised by some Members about the 57 students who were not successful in gaining a place. The group was informed that the idea had come out of the private sector and that businesses were getting more disappointed with the quality of the young people being placed on work experience. It was noted that perhaps the experience for those 57 students not chosen could be used in a positive way for example, being about the selection process and that jobs are not readily available in the real world and that employers benefited from having a young person that was more suitable and ready for the placement.
Our Role as
a Local Authority
29. The local authority has a strategic leadership role and could only use powers available it. It was believed that there are lots of people working in silos that need to start communicating more effectively to become more aware of what one another is doing and to think more about what can be achieved without requiring extra resources. Positive steps need to be taken to establish the right mechanism and creating a framework to achieving a quality offer from having such an ad-hoc process in place. A Member emphasised that it was important to get the mechanism right and get expert advice to young people through other avenues such as charity organisations and Youth Clubs.
Job Centre Plus
30. The group was informed that although Job Centre Plus do not offer guidance they do signpost where needed. There are a handful of young people who are seeking Job Seekers Allowance at the ages of 16/17 through hardship. It was outlined that for the 18-24 age range, this group is more difficult as there are remote packages made available through youth contracts. Regarding jobs, it was acknowledged that there are individuals who will avoid it but the vast majority do want to work and it’s about how they can be helped. Job Centre Plus also invite partnership organisations in to work with as it is recognised that they cannot work alone. The aim is to get people off the register and focus more on individuals getting a job rather than establishing a career. Some of the areas that they are involved in include young people - interventions, group sessions, apprenticeship schemes, curriculum vitae (CV) preparation, and basic interview techniques and are currently developing group sessions for 50+.
Network Information
Advice Guidance (IAG) in Barnsley
31. An explanation was provided about Network IAG in Barnsley that was formed in response to the Borough’s high NEETs statistics. It was outlined that a collaborative was formed to help schools meet their statutory duties and provide impartial and independent careers guidance package for pupils. Members were informed that the system works well for Barnsley but it was noted that Doncaster’s landscape was completely different to that in Barnsley, recognising that the Borough only had one college and one sixth form.
32. The group discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the collaborative and questioned whether it was something that could be delivered through the Doncaster Association for Training Manager (DATM).
33. As parents have such strong supporting and influential roles in their child’s life, concern was expressed with regard to how and what information was available to them. It was suggested that perhaps the issue could be addressed through Parent and Teacher Associations, but this was the responsibility of the school.
Future Work
Moving
forward
34. During the remainder of 2012/13, the Partnership’s
focus is on the following programmes that should reduce unemployment and the
number of NEETs across the Borough:
·
Working up the delivery
elements of the ‘City Deal’– this includes creating 4,000 new Apprentices
between 2013 and 2016 across the City Region, including 640 + 320 upskillings
of existing staff upskill in Doncaster;
·
Delivery of a product
that brings up-to-date Careers Information, Advice and Guidance in one place to
pupils, teachers, job seekers and businesses alike;
·
Continuing close work
with the Prime Contractors of major Government-backed programmes such as the
Work Programme to ensure our local people can take advantage of the opportunities
on offer from local employers;
·
Following the completion
of the Local Market Information survey ensuring that the Borough’s training
provision, the careers guidance offered to Children and Young People and Adults
and the business support offered to new and existing businesses is matched
against the results found; and
·
The Council will continue
to develop and deliver programmes to better connect local people to local jobs,
with a particular focus on Procurement.
35. Work has also included working on a framework and the purchase and implementation of a portal to provide better access for pre 16 age groups for careers, advice and guidance.
Challenging
Academies
36. Meetings are taking place with all Doncaster’s secondary schools to identify and evaluate the careers advice and guidance currently being provided. An update to the group identified those that were and were not meeting the statutory requirements. Chris Pratt, Director of Children and Young People’s Service had been informed of the schools not meeting the statutory requirement and that they would be challenged by the Directorates management team.
37. The group was informed that some schools had invested in a careers advisor providing 1 to 2 days per week at the school, but this was a reduction in what the Local Authority had provided, that being 3 to 4 days per week. The group was of the opinion that current provision was light touch and expressed concern that many children would not receive good support when trying to choose a career path. Councillors were pleased that a mechanism was in place to challenge schools on a number of issues, if it was thought they were providing an inadequate service.
38. School Governing bodies currently appoint champions for specialist roles, for example, safeguarding. The establishment of Governing Body Champions was proposed for Careers Advice and Guidance, but this would be a voluntary decision made by schools. It would be approached and promoted through presentations to Secondary Head and Governors’ forum.
Funding
39. To support delivery of the work and skills board, it was acknowledged that Doncaster MBC could contribute £120,000 until end of March however any carryover would require approval.
40. Sheffield City Region had funding allocations of between £24 to £25m. It was agreed with Sheffield City Council (as accountable body for the deal with Government) that Doncaster Council receives £640K grant funding to operate the Doncaster Hub. This will help deliver the additional 640 apprenticeships and 320 people upskilled over the next 3 years.
41. It was explained that through work undertaken as part of the Labour Market Information there had been 50 to 60 small businesses interested in such an initiative. The Council would be responsible for ensuring the Apprenticeships were of a certain standard/length and completed. The programme would be run through an existing mechanism rather than adding an extra provider in the Borough. The programmes would be demand led but aimed at businesses with 0 to 50 employees, additional to those that already actively provide apprenticeships. It was explained that the funding was not for wage replacement but aimed at sustainable employment growth in the borough.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. A report is presented to the Regeneration and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel in autumn 2013 detailing progress with apprenticeship programmes and progress of the Work and Skills Board, following consideration of the proposed Cabinet decision entitled Investing in Apprenticeships, Skills and Jobs.
Reason: Panel members would like to be updated on the information that they have received in relation to the work that is taking place with by the Work and Skills Board looking at employer led approaches and what the framework will look like. Progress is also required on the potential delivery of an additional 640 apprenticeships and 320 people upskilled over the next 3 years through £640K grant funding provided to Doncaster Council to operate the Doncaster Hub (subject to Cabinet approval).
2. The action proposed for Careers Advice and Guidance School Governor Champions be supported and propose that co-ordinated support package/guidelines be developed to assist all appointed Governors, including local authority Councillors in their role.
Reason: School Governing bodies currently appoint champions for specialist roles, for example, safeguarding. The establishment of Governing Body Champions was proposed for Careers Advice and Guidance, but this would be a voluntary decision made by schools. It would be approached and promoted through presentations to Secondary Head and Governors’ forum. Member of the group was supportive of this approach although felt that they needed to be equipped with the relevant information, knowledge and support in order to undertake this role.
3. The programme, actions and priorities of the Work and Skills Board, be supported.
Reason: The group showed support of the Work and Skills Partnership who had agreed the following priorities and delivery agreements:
Priority 1 – Improve the employability competencies of those in Education;
Priority 2 – Promote the value of apprenticeships and internships to businesses to make it easier to them to recruit; and
Priority 3 – Attract and retain graduates in the borough
The full set of priorities and actions to be delivered in 2013 can be viewed in Appendix 2.
4. The proposed Cabinet decision; Investing in Apprenticeships, Skills and Jobs, be supported.
Reason: Sheffield City Region had funding allocations
of between £24 to £25m. It was agreed
with Sheffield City Council (as accountable body for the deal with Government)
that Doncaster Council receives £640K grant funding to operate the Doncaster
Hub and stimulate demand. Access to the
remaining funding is dependent on the level of demand generated through by
Doncaster businesses. This will help deliver the additional 640
apprenticeships and 320 people upskilled over the next 3 years. The Chair of the Regeneration and Environment
Overview and Scrutiny Panel recently supported these proposals which the group
fully endorsed.
42. Further investigation is carried out into how the parental role can be further utilised and access can be increased to career advice and information through the Work and Skills Board programme and actions.
Reason: The potential role of parents was referred to and it was commented that they were an untapped resource that would be of no cost. It was felt that there is potential as parents have such strong supporting and influential roles in their child’s life, however, concern was expressed with regard to how and what information was available to them. One suggestion was that perhaps the issue could be addressed through Parent and Teacher Associations, but ultimately this was the responsibility of the school. It was felt that the potential role of parents was something that should be looked into further.
6. The work of the Children and Young People’s Management Team in holding the remaining Local Education Authority (LEA) and Academy schools to account with regard to the quality of careers advice and guidance being provided, be supported.
Reason: The statutory guidance to provide of face to face Careers Guidance was transferred to Schools from September 2012 and replaced with the requirement to provide access to impartial and independent careers guidance. Meetings are taking place with all secondary schools to identify and evaluate the careers advice and guidance currently being provided. The group was pleased to hear that those schools not meeting the statutory requirement and that they would be challenged be the Schools, Children and Young People’s management team.
7.
The development of a Doncaster Council quality
mark to be awarded to trainers/employers, be
considered.
Reason: It was felt that by offering a quality mark to trainers/employers in providing employment/training for apprenticeships would improve the quality and range of pre-employment programmes and training. A higher standard of service could also be established as well as achieving a certain level of information, provision and consistency amongst providers and recognition.
8.
Consideration is given to what could be applied
from the Barnsley IAG network to support Doncaster’s programme, bearing in mind
the differing landscapes.
Reason: Further to discussion at the meeting in December, information was provided on the Network IAG in Barnsley, formed in response to the Borough’s high NEETs statistics. This collaborative was formed to help schools meet their statutory duties and provide and impartial and independent careers guidance for pupils.
It was recognised that the system works well for Barnsley but it was noted that Doncaster’s landscape was completely different to that in Barnsley, recognising that the Borough only had one college and one sixth form. The group discussed the advantages and disadvantages of the collaborative and questioned whether it was something that could be delivered through the Doncaster Association for Training Manager (DATM). It was felt that this was something that could be considered further to see whether there is anything Doncaster could apply from it which would bring benefits.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Schools Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel would like to thank, for their time and information, the following people:
Philip Harris – Chief Executive, Doncaster Chamber |
Dan Fell – Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Doncaster Chamber |
Andrew Best – Partner, HSR Law |
Ian Hanks – External Strategic Partnership Manager for Job Centre Plus |
Pam Bolderson - Head of Connexions/IAG Lead |
George Trow – Principal of Doncaster College |
Deborah Burton, Active Involvement Co-ordinator/Young People's Training Co-ordinator |
Linda Hardy, Active Involvement Co-ordinator/Volunteer Co-ordinator |
DEMAND: LMI Headlines |
|
|||
SUPPLY: Present Skills Data |
|
|||
|
||||
SUGGESTED PRIORITIES |
“Pointing People in the right direction”; Improve Information Advice & Guidance at all
levels, linked to economic opportunities |
Improve the quality &
range of pre-employment programmes & training |
Increase the number of Apprentices
our businesses take on |
Develop high-end Skills by
generating Graduate-level opportunities & improving the leadership
capabilities of our businesses |
|
||||
SUGGESTED PROGRAMMES |
· Development of a ‘Work & Skills Governor’
network in Schools to communicate LMI/economic opportunities with teachers,
Parents et.al · Delivery of robust IAG product(s) for our young
people, rolled out to Secondary Schools/Colleges as a minimum |
· Regular & effective scrutiny on the quality of
provision · Improved links to Work Programme/Youth Contract
providers to improve delivery · Deliver the Logistics Academy, linked to Inland Port · Introduce ‘oversight’ of School-affiliated Work
experience |
· Deliver at least 640 new Apprenticeships across the
Borough between 2013 and 2016 through the City Deal-funded ‘Apprenticeship
Hub’ · Regular & effective scrutiny on the quality of
existing provision |
· Create public/private Partnerships to generate
Graduate opportunities/internships · Support the Private Sector to put a bid relating to
‘Leadership/Management’ into the Employer Ownership of Skills Fund (2013) |
All priorities must also
account for targeted marketing/communication campaigns (as needed) and must
properly scrutinise present standard of relevant provision |
Action Points from WORK and SKILLS
PARTNERSHIP BOARD
1st
FEBRUARY 2012
PART
1: Presentation of Work and Skills Priorities for 2013
Mark Clapham and Mathew Lynds presented the
suggested Work and Skills priorities and programmes for 2013, accounting for
the results of the recent LMI Survey.
The
Board agreed three main priorities for 2013:
Priority 1: Improve the employability competencies of those in Education;
Priority 2: Promote the value of apprenticeships and internships to businesses and make it easier for them to recruit; and
Priority 3: Attract and retain Graduates in the Borough.
Following a wide-ranging discussion on
suggested programmes for 2013, a consensus was reached on the following
actions.
PART 2: Agreement of Actions for delivery
in 2013
NOTE:
£120,000 is available in the Council’s budget until the end of March 2013 to
support the delivery of these programmes.
Any carryover would need to be agreed with the Council; funding
decisions to be made by the Board.
Programme 1: Improve the
employment competencies of those in Education.
-
STAGE 1:
Development of employment competencies for delivery – the ones presented to the
Board need to be refined and tested. Dan
Fell to organise Private Sector reps to do this; the
Board asked that entry-level positions were accounted for when undertaking this
work. These will be refined during
February.
-
STAGE 2: In order
for providers and schools to work towards these competencies, Gary Richardson
to link in with Ian Hanks, Alan Worboys, Jayne Vose and Mathew Lynds to
develop/refine materials for schools and young people (for instance as part of
Foundation Learning). As Scott Cardwell
and Jayne Vose stated, although the ‘competency model’ would be at the core of
all materials, it would be scaled up/down according to age range. Mick Werritt also confirmed that St Leger
Homes would link their relevant programmes to these competencies.
Programme 2: Establish
employability champions in each Secondary School and Sixth Form College.
-
This will initially be approached by presentations
at the following (Jo Moxon/Jayne Vose to organise):
Ø Secondary
Heads meeting (1 March 8.30 -11) – Jo Moxon suggested that a presentation was
needed on the ‘wow factor for Doncaster’ (to be delivered by Scott Cardwell)
followed by Schools’ role in making this happen (to be delivered by Jo
Moxon). Jo has stated that the majority
of the meeting will be given over for this item.
Ø Governors
Forum (early next term – April).
A package of materials to support the champions in
their role will be created by representatives from the Board once in place,
covering employment competencies and key employment programmes in the pipeline
for Doncaster and the region.
Programme 3:
Promote the value of Apprenticeships and Internships with local
businesses, including support that can be accessed via the City Deal-backed
Apprenticeship Hub.
-
Businesses regularly state they cannot find
information on a range of programmes easily enough.
-
As a result, Iain Thomson/Jayne Vose/Dan Fell/Roy
Barnes/Ian Hanks to work on a short document for use by local businesses and
for publication on numerous websites (including Business Doncaster) and backed
up by promotion – including with local professional intermediaries. This document needs to include support through
the local Apprenticeship Hub, the Youth Contract, the Work Programme and other
Apprenticeship schemes backed by NAS.
Once this paper has been put together, this will be edited by Private
Sector representatives.
-
The deadline on this is swift. First draft required by 28th February
for the Private Sector representatives to edit at their meeting (12 PM). The final document should be ready by the 14th of March to time with
National Apprenticeship week.
Programme 4: Make
Doncaster a viable destination for Graduates.
-
Graduate
destination Doncaster: Although the Board has missed this year’s
deadlines for Milkround, Nigel Brewster will convene a group together to start
working towards a viable model with businesses to push Doncaster as a viable
destination for Graduates. Links should
be made with the Enterprising Doncaster-led ‘Place Marketing’ programme as
required.
-
Group to be convened week commencing 4th
February.